<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Linking To John Chow dot Com Cause Your Site to be Penalized by Google?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/</link>
	<description>affiliate program, top affiliate program, best affiliate program, affiliate marketing tips and advice, seo tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 15:57:11 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanie</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-64258</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 05:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/#comment-64258</guid>
		<description>I have linked a lot to JC and never been penalized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have linked a lot to JC and never been penalized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Doesn&#8217;t Love Daegan Spam? Or &#8220;Delete to Avoid a Google Penalty&#8221; : Big Bucks Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-8831</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Doesn&#8217;t Love Daegan Spam? Or &#8220;Delete to Avoid a Google Penalty&#8221; : Big Bucks Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/#comment-8831</guid>
		<description>[...] trackback will soon link into a &#8220;bad neighborhood&#8221;. If you read further, you&#8217;ll discover why out-link to bad neighborhood&#8217;s could cause [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] trackback will soon link into a &#8220;bad neighborhood&#8221;. If you read further, you&#8217;ll discover why out-link to bad neighborhood&#8217;s could cause [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Getting Slapped Down By Google Is Easier Than You Think</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-8403</link>
		<dc:creator>Getting Slapped Down By Google Is Easier Than You Think</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 19:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/#comment-8403</guid>
		<description>[...] my opinion, Google really got serious about this technique when John Chow was using it to bomb Google with &#8220;make money online&#8221;. John Chow was slapped down then and has been since for what [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my opinion, Google really got serious about this technique when John Chow was using it to bomb Google with &#8220;make money online&#8221;. John Chow was slapped down then and has been since for what [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google penalties can be lifted : nicharalambous.com</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-8323</link>
		<dc:creator>Google penalties can be lifted : nicharalambous.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/#comment-8323</guid>
		<description>[...] There are some links that David provides to try and help with these issues; here and here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are some links that David provides to try and help with these issues; here and here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How I reversed my Google ranking penalty :: David Airey :: Graphic Designer</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-8322</link>
		<dc:creator>How I reversed my Google ranking penalty :: David Airey :: Graphic Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/#comment-8322</guid>
		<description>[...] If you have any info about the usefulness of the Bad Neighborhood tool, I&#8217;d love to know. Don Lawson at Affiliate Watcher asks some interesting questions about linking to bad neighbourhoods. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you have any info about the usefulness of the Bad Neighborhood tool, I&#8217;d love to know. Don Lawson at Affiliate Watcher asks some interesting questions about linking to bad neighbourhoods. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-6432</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/#comment-6432</guid>
		<description>Don,  thanks for bringing this to our attention.  I agree we need to pay attention to who we link to but this new guideline is really misguided.  link exchange has been around longer than google.  they have no right to tell webmasters  that link exchange violates the google webmaster guidelines.  whoever wrote that probably has a phd in  engineering and has probably never marketed a website through traditional link exchange in his or her life.

google, what happened to &quot;do no evil&quot;??  google is creating paranoia among well intentioned webmasters who link exchange for the benefit of end users.

Google should come out and state that fully automated link programs that force link exchange is what the problem is and that webmasters should use editor based software if they are going to manage linking.  I have been using linksmanager for 6 years and I am not going to stop now.  Google should clarify link exchange once and for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don,  thanks for bringing this to our attention.  I agree we need to pay attention to who we link to but this new guideline is really misguided.  link exchange has been around longer than google.  they have no right to tell webmasters  that link exchange violates the google webmaster guidelines.  whoever wrote that probably has a phd in  engineering and has probably never marketed a website through traditional link exchange in his or her life.</p>
<p>google, what happened to &#8220;do no evil&#8221;??  google is creating paranoia among well intentioned webmasters who link exchange for the benefit of end users.</p>
<p>Google should come out and state that fully automated link programs that force link exchange is what the problem is and that webmasters should use editor based software if they are going to manage linking.  I have been using linksmanager for 6 years and I am not going to stop now.  Google should clarify link exchange once and for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-6395</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/#comment-6395</guid>
		<description>Donna, that&#039;s one of my points. Gosh, I have a 6 year old Real Estate site with a links page I built years ago. Hundreds of outgoing links. 

They were quality sites when I linked to them but should I go and check every one to make sure they&#039;re not pointing a porn or gambling site? Geez, it would be easier to just get rid of all the links! 

Thanks for commenting, I appreciate you stopping by and taking part in the conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna, that&#8217;s one of my points. Gosh, I have a 6 year old Real Estate site with a links page I built years ago. Hundreds of outgoing links. </p>
<p>They were quality sites when I linked to them but should I go and check every one to make sure they&#8217;re not pointing a porn or gambling site? Geez, it would be easier to just get rid of all the links! </p>
<p>Thanks for commenting, I appreciate you stopping by and taking part in the conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DazzlinDonna</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/comment-page-1/#comment-6380</link>
		<dc:creator>DazzlinDonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.affiliatewatcher.com/will-linking-to-john-chow-dot-com-cause-your-site-to-be-penalized-by-google/#comment-6380</guid>
		<description>Those are interesting points you make.  I can understand that we should theoretically be mindful of what links we have on our sites, and I do spend time making sure the links I&#039;ve placed don&#039;t end up as 404s down the road, but there&#039;s no way I could check every link I&#039;ve posted, years later, to see if they are pointing to bad neighborhoods or not.  I mean, we don&#039;t even really know what criteria to use to determine if a site is in a bad neighborhood (we are forced to guess), but even if we knew exactly what to look for, it would be impossible to keep track over the years.  Would love to hear Matt comment on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are interesting points you make.  I can understand that we should theoretically be mindful of what links we have on our sites, and I do spend time making sure the links I&#8217;ve placed don&#8217;t end up as 404s down the road, but there&#8217;s no way I could check every link I&#8217;ve posted, years later, to see if they are pointing to bad neighborhoods or not.  I mean, we don&#8217;t even really know what criteria to use to determine if a site is in a bad neighborhood (we are forced to guess), but even if we knew exactly what to look for, it would be impossible to keep track over the years.  Would love to hear Matt comment on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
